oreofair.blogg.se

1. SRWARE IRON VS TOR PORTABLE
2. SRWARE IRON VS TOR FOR ANDROID
3. SRWARE IRON VS TOR PC
4. SRWARE IRON VS TOR PLUS
5. SRWARE IRON VS TOR ZIP

dll's from the whitelist, then adding both C:users. My final, successful approach involved removing all the.

SRWARE IRON VS TOR PORTABLE

or browserTor for those with std installations, and under the same two folders with a different path for portable versions such as I use) worked to elude the error. dll's associated with TOR (mainly located in the C:users. Nothing I tried in terms of removing and re-adding the various. I mention all of the above in the long-winded 2nd ¶ because I suspect it might offer a clue to someone smarter than I, and because it was in consideration of the somewhat-convoluted nature of the various browser instances that I found a method to resolve a new "Could Not Load XPCOM.dll" error encountered after deploying the TOR browser's newest iteration, 4.0.2. Considering what a fine AV suite WSA is, I simply consider the peculiarities of operation for this particular 'puter a small price to pay for Webroot's wonderful functionality, efficiency, and small footprint. I have no ready explanatin for why WSA displays these "alternate" locations in some instance and not in others, but since it has not noticeably decreased performance, I've done little investigation or troubleshooting (beyond submitting a long-ago support ticket that still languishes somewhere, unanswered). I've even got some referring to the Creator/Admin acct., which is reserved as an "emergency" acct., and so far logged into only a few times since the day W7 was installed in 2k10 - and never used to deploy any of the whitelisted files. Given that each also has least one backup copy on another drive, and given that I am unable to exclude complete drives (AFAIK), and given that WSA has a peculiar tendency to display one or another of these instances in the Application Protection whitelist, I've become used to seeing the whitelisted file registered as one of the backup locations rather than the actual run location I've manually or via-popup allowed. paf file) rather than installed (deployed from an. It can be a bit of a pain in my case, as the box in question (a W7 Home Premium, HP OEM, Compaq CQ500Y) has 3 separate user accounts (Built-in Administrator, Creator/Administrator, and a daily-use standard acct.), each of which has its own individual instances of these browsers - portable (deployed from a. dll's (sometimes in masse), and that previously sufficed. The standard approach I've typically used is to whitelist. I've struggled with this issue, along with similar ones concerning both Mozilla Firefox as well as Google Chrome, and "derivative" browsers that utilize them (TOR for former, SRWare's Iron for latter). Webroot® Legacy Products (2011 and Prior) 33.

SRWARE IRON VS TOR PC

SRWARE IRON VS TOR FOR ANDROID

SRWARE IRON VS TOR PLUS

Webroot® SecureAnywhere™ - Internet Security Plus 2479.Webroot® SecureAnywhere™ - Antivirus 6986.It'd be amazing if caching solely to RAM was offered in some version of Chromium but we're on v10 now and I think if it was going to happen, it'd have been done already. I currently have Iron's disk and media cache just set to 1. I wouldn't have a problem starting Iron in incognito by a command line switch but I've found the Chrome Speed Dial extension doesn't work in incognito.

It doesn't slow things nearly as much as Tor, more like just going from home to a small cafe with wifi access.

SRWARE IRON VS TOR ZIP

It's a 1.2mb zip with an exe and ini, I love programs like this. Ultrasurf works perfectly, (Danke schön!) once the Internet Explorer default stuff is deselected. I had it installed and in looking up my ip, it was the same as without the program and I already have Adthwart and Better Popup Blocker so I didn't notice any changes. Privoxy is more of an advanced ad blocker it seems but the website says it has more uses than that. It says this somewhere in the site which I don't quite understand because it gives specific situations of a user who may want to get around a network firewall yet as far as I know, if the ip is not changed this isn't possible unless by backdoor access. I have tried Privoxy and despite the name, does not actually hide your ip.